Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

A Big Power

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Student Solutions

Thank you to Louise, Niharika from Rugby School in England, JuHo from Beijing BISS International School in Korea and Tomasso from the British School of Milan in Italy for submitting solutions to this problem.

Here is Louise's answer to the first part:

We want to estimate $2^{2000}$ as a power of $10$ so we are trying to solve $2^{2000}=10^x$ for $x$. The first step is to take logs of both side with respect to a suitable basis such as $2$, so we get $2000=x\log_{2}{10}$. Now all that remains is to estimate $\log_{2}{10}$. We observe that it lies between $3$ and $4$ since $2^3=8$ and $2^4=16$. Hence as a rough approximation $x$ lies between $500$ and $700$, so $2^{2000}$ lies between $10^{500}$ and $10^{700}$.

JuHo has managed to improve on this range for $x$:

$2^{2000}=10^x$
$x=2000 \log_{10}{2}$

We can get two inequalitites for $\log_{10}{2}$.
Firstly, $\log{8}<\log{10}$, so $3\log{2}<1$ so $\log_{10}{2}<\frac{1}{3}=0.\dot{3}$.
Secondly $\log{1024}>\log{1000}$ so $10\log{2}>3$, so $\log_{10}{2}>\frac{3}{10}=0.3$.

In summary $0.3 < \log_{10}{2} < 0.\dot{3}$,
so $600
< x < 667$


JuHo found the first 5 digits of $2^{2000}$ by calculating it to log base 10 first:

$x=2^{2000}$
$\log_{10}{x}=2000\log_{10}{2}=602.059913\dots$
$x=10^{602.069913\dots}=10^{602} \times 10^{0.059913\dots}=1.14813\dots \times 10^{602}$

This shows that the first 5 digits of $x=2^{2000}$ are $1,1,4,8,1$ in that order.


Niharika noticed a neat way to find the final digit of $2^{2000}$ using the given fact that $2^{16}=65536$:

The first thing that is helpful to notice is that since $2000=16 \times 125$, $2^{2000}=(2^{16})^{125}=65536^{125}$

Hence, since $2^{2000}$ is a power of something ending in $6$, it will also end in $6$ because $6^2=36$


For finding the last two digits of $2^{2000}$, both Tomasso and JuHo had the following idea of trying to look for a pattern in the sequence of the last two digits of powers of 2.

The sequence whose $n^{th}$ term is the last two digits of $2^n$ is:
$02,04,08,16,32,64,28,56,12,24,48,96,92,84,68,36,72,44,88,76,52,04,08,16,32,64,...$
We see that the $22^{nd}$ term is the same as the $2^{nd}$ term and after this the sequence will repeat the same 20 terms over and over.

$2^{2000}$ corresponds to the $2000^{th}$ term of this sequence. The remainder when $2000-1$ is divided by $20$ is $19$, and hence, because the recurring starts from the second term, the last two digits of $2^{2000}$ is the same as the $20^{th}$ term of the sequence, so the last two digits are $76$.

Niharika found the last two digits by a similar method but considered powers of $36$ instead of $2$ as she used again the fact that $2^{2000}= 65536^{125}$.


You may also like

Powerful Quadratics

This comes in two parts, with the first being less fiendish than the second. It’s great for practising both quadratics and laws of indices, and you can get a lot from making sure that you find all the solutions. For a real challenge (requiring a bit more knowledge), you could consider finding the complex solutions.

Discriminating

You're invited to decide whether statements about the number of solutions of a quadratic equation are always, sometimes or never true.

Factorisable Quadratics

This will encourage you to think about whether all quadratics can be factorised and to develop a better understanding of the effect that changing the coefficients has on the factorised form.

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo