Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Transformation ... or Not?

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Student Solutions
Vatsal from Wilson's School saw this function as a sin graph, and approximated its translation:

Similar to a sin graph, with a stretch by scale factor $5$ parallel to the $y$-axis
Translation of approximately $\frac{\pi}{4}$ units in the negative $x$ direction.

Hence, $y \simeq 5sin(x+ \frac{\pi}{4})$.

Louis from EMS and Timothy from Wallington Country Grammar both calculated the horizontal translation of the graph. Timothy writes:

The immediate graph that springs to mind is a sine graph, except this new
graph has two transformations: a stretch scale factor $5$ in the y direction
because the peaks are reaching $5$ and $-5$ and then the second is a shift
along the $x$-axis. This means the equation of our new graph will be of the
form:
$y = ksin(x+c)$
where $k$ is the s.f. of the stretch and $c$ is the shift along the $x$-axis.

k is 5:

$y = 5sin(x+c)$

Now we need to find $c$. From observation it is clear that the graph passes
through the point (0,4) so we can sub these values in and solve $c$.
$4 = 5sin(0+c)$
$sin(c) = \frac{4}{5}$
$c = arcsin(\frac{4}{5})$.

So adding this value to are equation we can reach the final answer of:
$y = 5sin(x+arcsin(\frac{4}{5}))$

Jack from Portsmouth Grammar School saw this function as a cosine graph, and approximated its translation:

You can solve these types of problems by firstly inspecting the maximum and
minimum values of the graph.

Since the maximum and minimum values of a
$y=cos(x)$ graph are $1$ and $-1$, the function must involve $y=5cos(x)$. The
function is the graph of $y=5cos(x)$ shifted to the right by approximately $\frac{\pi}{4}$. Therefore
you subtract $\frac{\pi}{4}$ from the $x$-coordinate, to give $y \simeq 5cos(x-\frac{pi}{4})$.


Jamie from Bentleigh Secondary College calculated the horizontal translation of $y=5cos(x)$:

$f(x-cos^{-1}(\frac{4}{5}))=5cos(x)$

This result was achieved by initially letting $f(x-z) = 5cos(x)$, and
beginning to look towards a mathematical approach to finding the offset.
The approach I used (for ease and effectiveness) was to solve for $z$ when
$5cos(x-z) = 4$ while $x = 0$. This led me to find that $z = cos^{-1}(\frac{4}{5})$.

Jamie also discussed the idea of 'new' functions:

The question 'Do we always get new functions from old ones?', is difficult
to answer. Sometimes we perceive that we have a new function from an old
one, an example being the quadratic formula's relationship with
$f(x)=ax^2+bx+c$, where we acknowledge the former being a separate one from
the latter, where it is just some  'rearrangement' of the same function.
Then in our example where the function was some transformation of the
cosine function, we are tempted to say that it is not a new function, just
some 'changing' of the original one, where widely accepted information
shows that it is.

My understanding is that every function that is 'transformed' from an old
one, is not a new one, but simply a different version of it, what that new
function does could be similar or different from its original, but
nonetheless, the same.

Thank you to everybody who submitted a solution to this problem! 

You may also like

Powerful Quadratics

This comes in two parts, with the first being less fiendish than the second. It’s great for practising both quadratics and laws of indices, and you can get a lot from making sure that you find all the solutions. For a real challenge (requiring a bit more knowledge), you could consider finding the complex solutions.

Discriminating

You're invited to decide whether statements about the number of solutions of a quadratic equation are always, sometimes or never true.

Factorisable Quadratics

This will encourage you to think about whether all quadratics can be factorised and to develop a better understanding of the effect that changing the coefficients has on the factorised form.

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo