This exercise raises ethical questions relating to disease outbreaks that may be interesting for students to consider. It asks students to explore the difficulties policy makers face when discussing how to combat infectious disease.
Although not directly linked to the maths or science curriculum, this exercise requires students to think critically about issues in infectious disease control and to contemplate that sometimes the best public health or scientific approach may not be approved by politicians or welcomed by the general public.
It also allows students to consider the multi-disciplinary nature of infectious disease control, which can require involvement from mathematicians, scientists, politicians, ethicists, lawyers etc.
Make an informed personal response, recognising that other responses to a text are possible and evaluating these.
Planning for different purposes and audiences, including debates.
This could also offer discussion for PHSE classes.
Aims
To understand that infectious disease control policy has many dimensions and professionals from different sectors do not always agree on which approach is best from a public health perspective.
To understand that sometimes the best public health approach isn't always taken due to social, ethical or political factors.
To discuss ethical issues around infectious disease control.
To generate debate amongst students.
To get students to develop arguments for/against certain policies.
Activity (Small Groups)
Divide the class into small groups.
Give each group a print out of a newspaper article and get them to read it. You can either give the whole class the same article, or you can give different groups different articles (if the latter - get them to explain the subject aloud to the rest of the class before the debate).
Nominate different groups to take opposing sides to the debate.
Get the group to discuss and make a list of their key arguments that they are going to use.
Activity (Whole Class)
Let the groups nominate a spokesperson and start the debate.
Invite the groups to go back and forth in their debate.