Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Subtraction Slip

Age 5 to 7
Challenge Level Yellow star
Primary curriculum
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Well done to everyone who spotted the deliberate mistake on the video. As you may have noticed, the subtraction method needed more than one step, so you had to carefully watch the whole clip to see what went wrong towards the end of the calculation.

Krishna, from the CS Academy in India, explained what happened in the video clip:

She took away 50 and she was correct. Then she told us that she will subtract 8 but she subtracted 4 from 12. 

Jasmine, from Meavy Church of England Primary, also spotted the mistake as well as suggesting a way to make the calculation correct:

I did a number line and the mistake was that 12 - 8 is not 8 , it equals 4. If you had 12 sweets and you took away 8, there would be 4 sweets left. So the answer would be 4. If you had 16 sweets and took away 8, it would equal 8.

Thank you both.

Aria, from St Michael's School, in Japan, sent in this number line showing the correct working out and answer:

As many of you realised, there's several ways that you can work out 62 - 58. In the video, we saw a number line being used to try to find the answer. Krishna suggested a different way to calculate 62 - 58. See if you can follow this method too:

STEP ONE

62 - 2 = 60

STEP TWO

60 - 2 - 58

STEP THREE

2 + 2 = 4

So 62 - 58 = 4

Krishna preferred this counting backwards approach than using a number line:

The reason I changed the method was that it takes three easy steps to find out how much greater 62 is than 58.

Do you agree with Krishna?

Aria shared this different method:

58 + 2 + 2 = 62

So 62 - 58 = 4

It has fewer steps so you are less likely to get mixed up and make a mistake.

What do you notice about Aria's and Krishna's methods? What's the same about them? What's different?

As we saw in the video clip, it's very easy to make a mistake when we calculate. If you checked your answer to 62 - 58, how did you do it? I wonder if you could have checked it another way too?

Related Collections

  • Other videos

You may also like

Homes

Six new homes are being built! They can be detached, semi-detached or terraced houses. How many different combinations of these can you find?

Number Squares

Start with four numbers at the corners of a square and put the total of two corners in the middle of that side. Keep going... Can you estimate what the size of the last four numbers will be?

I'm Eight

Find a great variety of ways of asking questions which make 8.

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo