Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Solving by Squaring

Age 16 to 18
ShortChallenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Solutions

 

Between the solutions we received, there was agreement that $x=-1$ was a valid solution, but some disagreement about whether $x=-4$ was a valid solution.

Marianna from Aiglon College in Switzerland decided that $x=-4$ is not a valid solution. This is Marianna's work:

Alfie came to the same (correct) conclusion using logarithms:



 

Marianna concluded:
(C) One solution is correct and the incorrect solution arises as a result of step (1)

While solution $x=-1$ works, $x=-4$ does not work. This is because when the equation is squared in step (1), the possibility of having a negative solution arises [that is, the possiility that $\sqrt{x+5}\lt 0$ arises]. However, when plugged back the positive square root does not allow a negative answer.

Shubhangee from Buckler's Mead Academy in England used graphs to explore this idea further:
The square root of 1 in the example is a type of one-to-one function, however the [incorrect solution arises by using the square root as] a case of one-to-many, which is not a function.

If we were to graph the original question using GeoGebra, then it would look something like this:

The green line is $y=\sqrt{x+5}$ and the orange line is $y=x+3$ and the point at which they intersect is $-1.$
This graph proves that the original question has only one possible solution.
The $-4$ result arises because we will always get a positive integer when we square numbers, even if they are negative.
Both $-4$ and $-1$ become a solution when we square both sides of the equation like we did in step (1), but if left in the original function form, then the question has only one solution which is $-1.$

 

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo