Or search by topic
We received a good international response to this classic problem: Patrick, from Woodbridge School and Aurimas from Chatham Grammar School for Boys in England; Neil from Kensal Park in Canada; Jungsun and Junho from Nanjing International School in China.
Each adopted a slightly different way of viewing the problem and it might be interesting to compare approaches: for this reason we include all correct responses in full!
Parts E, F and G caused the most trouble with a few incorrect solutions concerning identities and inverses; overall, however, a full answer was constructed by all respondents collectively. Well done!
Patrick adopted a classic minimalist approach of a mathematician by realising that a single counterexample was sufficient to show that something was not a group. He uses notation of != to mean 'not equal to' and '==' to mean 'is equivalent to. Of course, this hides any thought which went into creating these counterexamples!
Part a) The set of natural numbers with subtraction is not a group, since $3-7 =-4$ which is not in the set, so the property of closure is not satisfied.
Part b) The set of positive rationals with division is not a group, since taking $a=1, b=2, c=3$ we have $(1/2)/3 = 1/6 != 1/(2/3) = 3/2$, so the property of associativity is not satisfied.
Part c) The set of natural numbers with multiplication is not a group, since there is no inverse of 2: The identity is $1$, so $2*x = x*2 = 1$, where $x$ is the inverse. $2x = 1$ implies $x = 1/2$ which is not in the set of natural numbers.
Part d) The set of positive even integers with multiplication is not a group since the identity does not exist: there is no even number by which 4 can be multiplied to give $4$: $4x = 4$ $x = 1$ which is not a member of the even natural numbers.
Part e) $m*n = m+n+1$; find the identity and inverse of m. The identity is $e$ such that $m*e == e*m == m$; $m*e == m+e+1 == e*m$ by definition, so we need $m+e+1 == m$ $e+1 == 0$ $e == -1$
Aurimas followed a similar style to Patrick:
Part a:The given set with an operation of subtraction does not satisfy the first condition( did not even consider the other ones, as Closure is not satisfied). Let $a = 3$ and $b = 5$, but then $3-5=-2$ which is not a natural number, and is not in the group, therefore it is not a group
Part b: This set does not satisfy ASSOCIATIVITY. Let $a = 2 b = 4 c = 6$, then $(a*b)*c = (b*c)*a ( 48 = 48)$, but when division comes in, this condition is not satisfied, eg : $((a/b))/c =( 1/12)$ is not equal to $((b/c))/a =( 1/3)$ and therefore it is not a group.
Neil realised for part G that an standard
arithmetical equation could be solved to find identities and
inverses:
Part g: To find the identity, we set up an equation: $xy+x+y=x$.
Subracting $x$ from both sides, we get $xy+y=0$. Therefore,
$y(x+1)=0$ or $y=0$. Hence, the identity is $0$. To find $x$'s
inverse, we set up another equation: $xy+x+y=0$. Then, $y(x+1)=-x$
or $y=-x/(x+1)$. Therefore, $x$'s inverse is $-x/(x+1)$.
Jungsun adopted a more expansive approach in which ways to alter the structure of the groups as given so that the various axioms might be satisfied were also considered along with counterexamples. Jungsun also looked at which axioms did work and why that was the case. We really liked this: if something doesn't quite work mathematicians often work very hard to understand how something MIGHT be made to work. Mathematics is as much about exploration of mathematical structures as it is about answering specific questions. Well done!
PART a) For the first property, closure, for all positive integers
$a$ and $b$ in the group, the element of $a-b$ should be also in
the group. However, if $a$ is smaller than $b$, the value of $a-b$
is negative and doesn't satisfy the property. On the other hand,
for all integers $a$ and $b$, the element of $a+b$ is always an
integer which satisfies the property.
For the second property, associativity, for all positive integers, the element of $(a - b) - c$ should equal to $a - (b - c)$. However, if $a=1, b=3$, and $c=7$, ($a-b)-c =(1-3)-7=-9$ while $a-(b-c) =1-(3-7)=5$ which doesn't qualify the property. But for all integers, $(a + b) + c = a + (b + c)$ definitely works.
For the third property, identity, for all positive integers $a$ and $e$, $a - e = e - a = a$ should work. To satisfy it, $e$ should be $0$, but since it is not a positive integer, the property is not fulfilled. But for all integers, since $0$ is included in an integer group, $a + e = e + a = a$ works.
For the fourth property, inverses, for all positive integers $a$ and $a'$, $a - a' = a' - a = e$ should work. However, since the third property is not satisfied, there is no e, so the fourth one can't be worked. For all integers, however, there is the value of $e$ and $a + a' = a' + a =0$ works.
PART b) For the first property, closure, for all positive rational
numbers $a$ and $b$ in the group, the element of $a/b$ should be
also in the group. However, if $a = 1$ and $b = 3$, the value of
$a/b$ is not a rational number anymore, so it doesn't satisfy the
property. On the other hand, for all positive rational numbers $a$
and $b$, the element of $a*b$ is always a positive rational number
which satisfies the property.
For the second property, associativity, for all positive rational numbers, the element of $(a/b)/c$ should equal to $a/(b/c)$. However, if $a = 1, b = 2$, and $c = 10$, $(a/b)/c = (1/2)/10 = 0.05$ while $a/(b/c) = 1/(2/10) =5$ which doesn't qualify the property. But for all positive rational numbers, $(a*b)*c = a*(b*c)$ definitely works.
For the third property, identity, for all positive rational numbers $a$ and $e$, $a/e =e/a = a$ should work. However, there is no way to satisfy it. But for all positive rational numbers, $a*e = e*a = a$ works when $e=1$.
For the fourth property, inverses, both multiplication and division work. For division, when $a$ equals to $a'$ and for multiplication, when a equals to $1/a'$.
PART c) For the first property, $a*b$ works for all positive
integers.
For the second property, $(a*b)*c = a*(b*c)$ also works for all positive integers.
For the third property, identity, for all positive integers $a$ and $e$, $a*e =e*a = a$ works when $e=1$.
However, for the fourth property, inverses, for all positive integers $a$ and $a'$, $a*a' = a'*a =1$ should work. It is satisfied when $a$ equals to $1/a'$ , but then, $1/a'$ is not a positive integer anymore.
So the set of positive integers with the operation of multiplication doesn't form a group.
PART d) For the first property, $a*b$ works for all positive even
integers. For the second property, $(a*b)*c = a*(b*c)$ also works
for all positive even integers.
For the third property, identity, for all positive even integers $a$ and $e$, $a*e = e*a = a$ works when $e=1$, but since $1$ is not a positive even integer, it doesn't work.
Since the third property doesn't work, the fourth one doesn't work as well.
So the set of positive even integers with the operation of multiplication doesn't form a group.
PART f) For all integers, $m*n = m+(-1)mn$ works. For the identity
element, $m*e =e*m = m+(-1)me = m$ and $e = 0$. For the inverse
element, $m*m' = m'*m = e$ which is $0$. So $m+(-1)mm'$ should
equal to $0$. When m is an odd integer, $m'=m$ while $m$ is an even
integer, $m'=-m$. In brief, the identity element is $0$ and when
$m$ is an odd integer, the inverse element of element $m$ is $m$,
while it is an even integer, that of element $m$ is $-m$.
PART g) For all real numbers excluding the number $-1$,
$x*y=xy+x+y$ works. For the identity element, $x*e=e*x=xe+x+e=x$.
So $xe+e=0$. To satisfy $e(x+1)=0$ for all real numbers $x$, e
should be $0$. For the inverse element of element $x$,
$x*x'=x'*x=e$ which is $0$. So $xx'+x+x'=0$ and $x'(x+1)=-x$. As a
result, $x'=(-x)/(x+1)$. In brief, the identity element is $0$ and
the inverse element of element $x$ is $(-x)/(x+1)$.
Junho laid out the solution to parts e, f and g very clearly:
This problem was also published several years ago: the solutions received the first time around are shown here:
Good solutions to 'What's A Group' came from Curt from Reigate College and Andrei from Tudor Vianu National College, Bucharest, Romania.
Learn about the rules for a group and the different groups of 4 elements by doing some simple puzzles.
This article only skims the surface of Galois theory and should probably be accessible to a 17 or 18 year old school student with a strong interest in mathematics.
The binary operation * for combining sets is defined as the union of two sets minus their intersection. Prove the set of all subsets of a set S together with the binary operation * forms a group.