Christopher from Farnborough 6th Form College and Tim from Royds
School solved this problem using different methods so here are both
their solutions. Christopher found the Cartesian equations of both
planes and Tim's shorter method used vector and scalar products.
This is Christopher's solution: Let P_1 be a plane through the
points A(2,1,0), B(1,1,1) and C(1,7,3) and P_2 be a plane
through the points A, B and V(x,y,z). Find all the points
V(x,y,z) such that the two planes are perpendicular.
The general equation of a plane in 3 dimensional Cartesian space
is: ax + by + cz + d = 0
This equation will be divided through
by a, and slightly rearranged, to make the following process
somewhat easier: x + py + qz = r
Where: p = b/a,\ q = c/a,
and r = -d/a.
By substituting the x, y, and z values from the points A, B,
and C into the general equation, it is possible to obtain the
three equations below involving p, q, and r that can be solved
simultaneously to derive the formula of the plane P_1.
\begin{eqnarray} 2 + p &=& r \\ 1 + p + q &=& r\\
1 + 7p + 3q &=& r \end{eqnarray}
Substituting this, and the relation in (1) into (3) gives:
\begin{eqnarray} 1 + 7p + 3 &=& 2 + p \\ 6p &=&
-2 \\ p &=& -1/3 \end{eqnarray}
Finally, substituting this into (1) gives: 2 - 1/3 = r\ \rm{so}\
r = 5/3.
Therefore, the equation of the plane P_1 is: x -
1/3y + z = 5/3.
Multiplying throughout by 3 gives: 3x - y + 3z
= 5.
Rearranging for y gives: y = 3x + 3z - 5
This implies
that for every unit increase in the x or z direction, there is
a corresponding increase of 3 in the y direction. A normal plane
would therefore have the property that for an increase of 3 in the
x or z direction, there would be a corresponding increase of
-1 in the y direction. This implies that the vector (3, -1,
3) describes a translation such that for any point on the plane
P_2 (which is normal to P_1), the resulting point will also lie
on P_2.
The translation is applied to point A(2,1,0), giving the point
D(5,0,3). Using the points A, B, and D, which all lie on the
plane P_2, the formula for P_2 can be determined:
\begin{eqnarray} 2 + p &=& r\\ 1 + p + q &=& r\\
5 + 3q &=& r. \end{eqnarray}
From (4) - (5) 1 - q = 0\ \rm {so}\ q = 1.
Substituting this
into (6) gives: 5 + 3 = r\ \rm {so}\ r = 8.
Substituting this
into (2)gives: 1 + p + 1 = 8\ \rm{so}\ p = 6.
Therefore the
equation of the plane P_2 is: x + 6y + z = 8.
or: x + 6y +
z - 8 = 0.
The point V(x,y,z) lies on this plane; therefore,
all the points V(x,y,z) such that the two planes P_1 and P_2
are perpendicular are those that obey the equation above.
This is Tim's method:
Let a \times b denote the cross product of a and b. Let v_1
= AC \times AB (which is perpendicular to P_1). Let v_2 = AB
\times AV (which is perpendicular to P_2).
As P_1 and P_2 are perpendicular, v_1 and v_2 are
perpendicular as the angle between the planes is the same as that
between their perpendiculars. Thus, the scalar product v_1.v_2 =
0.
\begin{eqnarray} AC &=& (1,7,3) - (2,1,0) &=&
(-1,6,3)\\ AB &=& (1,1,1) - (2,1,0) &=& (-1,0,1)\\
AV &=& (x,y,z) - (2,1,0) &=& (x-2,y-1,z).
\end{eqnarray}
v_1 = AC \times AB = (-1,6,3)\times(-1,0,1) = 6i - 2j + 6k
(which I evaluated using the determinant method)
v_2 = AB \times AV = (-1,0,1)\times(x-2,y-1,z) = (1-y)i +(x+z-2)j
+(1-y)k
(again, using determinant method)
v_1.v_2 = 6 -6y -2x -2z + 4 + 6 -6y =0.
Therefore 2x + 12y +
2z = 16 (rearranging) or, x + 6y + z = 8 (dividing by 2). This
is the equation of the plane containing all V(x,y,z) (the plane
P_2)
Note: (6,-2,6).(1,6,1) = 6 - 12 + 6 = 0 i.e. the two planes are
perpendicular (as required).
Also, A and B are in P_2 (as required) since (2,1,0) and
(1,1,1) are solutions of the equation.
See how 4 dimensional quaternions involve vectors in 3-space and
how the quaternion function F(v) = nvn gives a simple algebraic
method of working with reflections in planes in 3-space.