Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

How Many Solutions?

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions

This is a 'quickie'.

Ling Xiang Ning of Raffles Institution in Singapore, found two solutions, and after trying some more values of x, decided that there would be no more because:
"The graphs of $y = x$ and $y = (\sqrt {2})^x$ cut at exactly two points $(2, 2)$ and $(4, 4)$ so there are exactly two solutions."

Vassil from Lawnswood High School in Leeds, used a different graph to convince himself that there were no more solutions.
First of all, he rearranged the equation:


$$ \eqalign { x &=& (\sqrt{2})^x \\ \sqrt[x]{x} &=& \sqrt{2} }$$ (taking the $x^{th}$ root)

$$ \eqalign { (\sqrt[x]{x})^2 &=& 2 \\ x^{\frac{2}{x}} &=& 2 } $$ (squaring).


Next he calculated values of $x^{\frac{2}{x}}$ from $1$ to $8$, and plotted this graph:


Vassil commented that by looking at the original equation we could rule out negative values of $x$, and that the values in the graph decline after $x=4$. The justification for the decline is that we are calculating smaller and smaller powers. However, you may not be convinced, as the number we are finding powers of is getting bigger. Are you sure that curve isn't going to go up again further along?

The use of a graph to justify there being only 2 solutions was a good idea.

Clearly $x=0$ is not a solution and there are no negative solutions because the right hand side is positive. We have found 2 solutions $x=2$ and $x=4$ and we have to show that there are no other solutions.

Consider the function $f(x) = (\sqrt 2)^x = exp(x\ln \sqrt 2)$. Differentiating the function gives: $$\frac{df}{dx} = (ln \sqrt 2)\times exp(x\ln \sqrt 2)$$ and $$\frac{d^2f}{dx^2} = (ln \sqrt 2)^2\times exp(x\ln \sqrt 2)> 0.$$ So the graph of f is convex (the first derivative, or gradient, is always increasing) so the graph of $y=f(x)$ meets $y=x$ in at most 2 points. So $2$ and $4$ are the only solutions.

You may also like

Telescoping Series

Find $S_r = 1^r + 2^r + 3^r + ... + n^r$ where r is any fixed positive integer in terms of $S_1, S_2, ... S_{r-1}$.

Growing

Which is larger: (a) 1.000001^{1000000} or 2? (b) 100^{300} or 300! (i.e.factorial 300)

Climbing Powers

$2\wedge 3\wedge 4$ could be $(2^3)^4$ or $2^{(3^4)}$. Does it make any difference? For both definitions, which is bigger: $r\wedge r\wedge r\wedge r\dots$ where the powers of $r$ go on for ever, or $(r^r)^r$, where $r$ is $\sqrt{2}$?

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo