Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

IFFY Triangles

Age 14 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Nayanika from The Tiffin Girls' School and Ben from Thomas Hardye, both in the UK, both proved the first pair of statements, and an anonymous solution combined the two statements into a single 'if and only if' statement.

This is Nayanika's proof for statement 1a (if $A,B$ and $C$ are in an arithmetic progression, then $B=60^\circ$):

This is Ben's proof for statement 1b (if $Y=60^\circ,$ then $X, Y$ and $Z$ are in an arithmetic progression):

Ben's proof is good, but the final statement is actually the wrong way around. Ben started by assuming that $Y=60,$ and showed that whenever $Y=60,$ $X,Y$ and $Z$ form an arithmetic progression. This is written as $$Y=60\Rightarrow X,Y,Z\text{ form an arithmetic progression}$$

An anonymous solution combined this pair of statements into a single 'if and only if' statement:

Therefore, $ABC$ is a triangle with angles $A,B$ and $C$ where $A\lt B\lt C$ $$A,B,C \text{ form an arithmetic progression}\iff B=60$$

Ben and Nayanika both sent in proofs for the second pair of statements, and the anonymous solution combined them into a single 'if and only if' statement.

Ben proved statement 2a (that in a triangle $PQR,$ if the lengths $PQ$ and $QR$ are equal, then angles $P$ and $R$ are equal):

To confirm that the perpendicular bisector to side $PR$ really does pass through $Q$ and $S,$ note that $Q$ and $S$ are both equidistant from $P$ and $R.$

Nayanika proved statement 2b (that in a triangle $KLM,$ if angles $K$ and $M$ are equal, then lengths $KL$ and $LM$ are equal) using congruence:

Ben proved statement 2b using trigonometry:

Once again, the anonymous solution combined the two statements into one single 'if and only if' statement:

Therefore, PQR is a triangle $$PQ = QR \iff \hat{P} = \hat{Q}$$

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo