Or search by topic
Trial for n | Trial | Error |
21 - This is just trying a high odd number |
If n is 21 then x/18=7.5 so x will be 135. The sum of all the
numbers between 1 and21 is 231 so the three removed numbers must
total 96. There are such numberswhich are 31, 32 and 33 but since
the numbersonly go up to 21 this is not possible.
|
This does not work because the numbers are out of range, so it
means that this number is too high.
|
19 '?? This is going down by one odd number. | If n is 19 then x/16=7.5 so x will be 120. The sum of all the numbers between 1 and 19 is 190 so the three removed numbers must total 70. But there are no three consecutive numbers that total 70 so 19 cannot be a possible value for n. | This does not work, the three removed consecutive numbers will be around 23 and even that is out of range and too high. |
17 '?? Once more going down by an odd number, is this low enough? | If n is 17 then x/14=7.5 so x will be 105. The sum of all the numbers between 1 and 17 is 153 so the three removed numbers must total 48. There are such numbers which are 15, 16 and 17. | This works well and therefore is a right answer. So this is just low enough as one of the removed numbers is the highest in the range. |
15 '?? Even though a correct answer has been found already it always good to check if there is more than one answer. This was also the first estimate made so this is also to check the original estimate. | If n is 15 then x/12=7.5 so x will be 90. The sum of all the numbers between 1 and 15 is 120 so the three removed numbers must total 30. There are such numbers which are 9, 10 and 11. | This works well also and therefore is a right answer, so the first estimate made was correct |
13 '?? This is going down now and I have realised that the total of the three consecutive numbers are becoming smaller and smaller and this is just experimenting on how low it can go | If n is 13 then x/10=7.5 so x will be 75. The sum of all the numbers between 1 and 13 is 91 so the three removed numbers must total 16. There are no possible numbers so 13 is an impossible value for n. | This is an impossible possibility for n. The rough number for the three consecutive numbers would be roughly five so it is still possible to go down further. |
11 '?? This is going down further to see if there might be any possible values for n which are quite small. | If n is 11 then x/8=7.5 so x will be 60. The sum of all the numbers between 1 and 11 is 66 so the three removed numbers must total 6. There are such numbers and they are 1, 2 and 3. | This works well also and therefore is a right answer. Because this goes down to 1 as a removed number then it is impossible to go any further as 1 is the smallest value. Therefore 11 is the smallest possible answer for n. |
Conclusion: n=17, 15 and 11
are the only possible
solutions.
|
n | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
x | 1 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 6.5 | 9 | 11.83 | 15 |
n | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
S | 6 | 10.5 | 16 | 22.5 | 30 | 38.5 | 48 |
The familiar Pythagorean 3-4-5 triple gives one solution to (x-1)^n + x^n = (x+1)^n so what about other solutions for x an integer and n= 2, 3, 4 or 5?
Two cubes, each with integral side lengths, have a combined volume equal to the total of the lengths of their edges. How big are the cubes? [If you find a result by 'trial and error' you'll need to prove you have found all possible solutions.]