Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

In the Bag

Age 11 to 14
Challenge Level Yellow star
Secondary curriculum
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Why do this problem?

This problem introduces students to the limitations of making predictions based on small samples, and how predictions can become more reliable as the number of experiments increases. The problem challenges students to make predictions based on the information they gather. It offers students a chance to test various strategies for reaching the target in the most efficient way.

The can be used as a starting point for developing the skills of making and testing hypotheses. Students can suggest various possible strategies, then make decisions about the information that is required to compare their efficiency and how to analyse the data that is collected.
 

Possible approach
 

Place 10 marbles (or counters, multilink cubes...) in a bag/envelope/hat and ask students if they can predict the colours of the marbles.
To help them make accurate predictions allow them to pick one marble, record its colour and return it to the bag before repeating the process.
After this has been done 10 times:
"Do you now know the colours of the 10 marbles?"
"If not, why not?"
"Is there anything we can be sure of?"
Record the results of another 10 viewings.
"Are the results the same/different?" "Why?"
"Can you now predict the colours of the 10 marbles?"
Repeat a few more times.
"What can you do with the different sets of results?"
When the class become fairly confident that they can predict the contents of the bag, show them what the bag contains.

Demonstrate the interactivity and clarify the scoring system.

"Can you develop an effective strategy for reaching 1000 points?"

"Can you develop an effective strategy for reaching 1000 points in the least number of rounds?"
Allow students some time to test their strategies using the interactivity.

Bring students back together (possibly in a follow-up lesson).

Discuss, refine and list possible strategies. Ask students (possibly working in small groups) to select different strategies to test.

Discuss

  • how they could test the effectiveness of their strategy
  • what data they will need to collect
  • the amount of data needed to ensure meaningful results
Ask groups of students to write down a plan for what they will do to test their strategy before they carry out the investigation. Give them time to collect, analyse and interpret the data before presenting their findings to other groups.
 
What methods of collection, analysis and representation were most appropriate and effective in communicating their findings? Discuss the merits and pitfalls of different approaches highlighting good choices and appropriate use of the data.
 

Key questions
 

Is it better to have just a few viewings before making a guess or is it better to have more viewings and improve your chances of guessing correctly?
How do you decide on the most effective strategy?
 

Possible extension
 

Ask students to articulate two clear strategies, test them and then produce a clear justification of why one strategy is better than the other.
Encourage students to read the article Understanding Hypotheses
 

Possible support
 

Do the introductory activity several times before moving on to the interactivity.
Discuss the value of averaging the results.

You may also like

Reaction Timer

This problem offers you two ways to test reactions - use them to investigate your ideas about speeds of reaction.

See the Light

Work out how to light up the single light. What's the rule?

Introducing NRICH TWILGO

We're excited about this new program for drawing beautiful mathematical designs. Can you work out how we made our first few pictures and, even better, share your most elegant solutions with us?

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo