Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Hold Still Please

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Why do this problem?

This problem will develop students' intuition and skill with vectors and force laws in a context which encourages exploration and does not require any calculation to get started. By trying to construct stable configurations students will be led towards the notion of static points only occurring at places of zero electrostatic potential.

Possible approach

This problem is very open and well suited to discussion to get things started. The main requirement is the encouragement that students start to try out specific configurations and then use the force law to determine whether or not the configuration will remain static.

More general statements are, of course, more subtle and difficult to analyse than particular examples. Clear, systematic thinking will be needed, as will a clear representation system (diagrammatically or algebraically).

After doing this problem, you might refer students to 'Earnshaw's theorem' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnshaw%27s_theorem

Key questions

Are there any obvious simple cases to look at?

Can you make any symmetrical configurations to look at?

What is special, if anything, about configurations in which $1$ or more particles don't move?

How might you attempt to fix down a configuration which will move by adding more fixed particles?

Possible extension

Take an entirely stable configuration. Consider the question: what happens if you nudge one of the particles slightly?

Possible support

Concentrate on intuitive attempts at the problem.

You may also like

Lunar Leaper

Gravity on the Moon is about 1/6th that on the Earth. A pole-vaulter 2 metres tall can clear a 5 metres pole on the Earth. How high a pole could he clear on the Moon?

Which Twin Is Older?

A simplified account of special relativity and the twins paradox.

Whoosh

A ball whooshes down a slide and hits another ball which flies off the slide horizontally as a projectile. How far does it go?

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo