Kimberly wants to define 3^{3^3} as (3^3)^3 but Nermeen thinks that such a stack of powers should be defined as 3^{(3^3)} .
Do their definitions lead to the same numerical value? Is the same true if 3 is replaced with some other number?
How would Kimberly's and Nermeen's definitions most naturally extend to the definition of 3^{3^{3^3}}? Do their definitions lead to the same numerical value? Is the same true if 3 is replaced with some other number?
Extension: Try to compute the approximate size of the numbers as powers of 10.
Did you know ... ?
Both definitions of powers are equally valid, and in mathematics it should be clear from the context as to which to apply: mathematicians often include the brackets to avoid ambiguity. Kimberly's definition of powers is often relevant in mathematics problems whereas Nermeen's definition of powers is often relevant in computer science problems.