Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Light Weights

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

This problem is best tackled by using the formula given to you carefully. 

Christopher from Sale Grammar sent us his working here. He comments:

Using the values of 1956N and 1975N for the extremities of the earths surface we can see that the range of values would be 19N which equates to around 2kg. so, if a weightlifter was to do some weightlifting at the bottom of the Arctic, and then the top of Mount Chimborazo, they would feel a slight difference. However, when it comes to the main aim of the olympics, winning, it is clear that of course, everyone will be under the same stresses, so in terms of competition, everything will be fine. And there are other considerations at various altitudes too, such as air quality and density, and there are some serious considerations to be had at the bottom of the arctic. So in conclusion, yes, it would make a difference to the appeared strength of the weightlifter, but only by about 2kg.

Patrick from Otterborne included a table with his solution, showing the weight varying with altitude. How high would you have to go to lift 200kg?

Altitude (km) Weight (%, relative to 200kg) Weight (kg)
0 100 200
10 99.69 199.37
50 98.45 196.90
100 96.93 193.87
500 85.98 171.95
1000 74.71 149.41
5000 31.39 62.78
10000 15.14 30.29
50000 5.84 11.67

Related Collections

You may also like

Little Little G

See how little g and your weight varies around the world. Did this variation help Bob Beamon to long-jumping succes in 1968?

Fundamental Particles Collection

A collection of problems related to the mathematics of fundamental physics.

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo