Or search by topic
Ege, Burcu, Bana and Alara all sent in examples of numbers that they had experimented with. They found that their digits always added up to a multiple of nine, and that the numbers themselves were also divisible by nine. They concluded that there is a link between these two properties, so that if a number has digits that sum up to nine, it must be a multiple of nine. Here are some of their examples:
They also repeated the exercise for the set of numbers 1-8 and found that the result was the same:
And for the set of numbers 0-9:
Rohaan from Longbay Primary School explained why this always works for the sum of any numbers made from the digits 1-9:
I think the reason behind this is when you add all the digits (from 1 to 9) the total is 45. 45 is divisible 9 so whatever groups of numbers you make and add up must be divisible by 9.
That's right, and the numbers 1-8 add up to 36, which is also a multiple of 9, so the rule still works. For the sets of numbers 1-6 and 1-5, Ege and Banu found a similarly interesting result for multiples of 3:
So there you have it! This rule only works for multiples of 3 or 9, but it makes it very quick and easy to find out whether or not a big number is divisible by 3 or 9 without using a calculator. Thank you for all your excellent solutions.
15 = 7 + 8 and 10 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4. Can you say which numbers can be expressed as the sum of two or more consecutive integers?