Or search by topic
We knew a great deal about Tom's number, and people made good use of the information to figure out what the number was exactly.
Kevin from Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada narrowed down the answer by following the clues step by step. Once he was sure he had Tom's number, he returned to the clues to prove that his answer was the correct one. Thomas from Tattingstone Primary, near Ipswich, thought of possible answers and then arrived at his final answer by eliminating the numbers that would not work for the clues given. Holly and Joanne, from Moorfield Juniors, used a technique called guess and check; they chose a number that they estimated was reasonable and then checked it against each of the clues.
Good detective work led many of you to finding out what Tom's Number was. Ben, Malcolm and Paul from Yarm Primary School, Jake and Ben of Moorgate Primary in Tamworth, Staffordshire, Zoe of Eastbury Farm School, and classmates Matt, Adam, Dave and Chris all found the answer.
The solutions sounded very much like entries from Sherlock Holmes. Anis wrote:
From the information that was stated I can conclude that the number is:
Once I knew the number was palindromic I tried dividing 1331, 1221, 1111 and 1001 by 7. 1001 was the only one that gave a whole number of 143. I divided that by all the odd numbers between 7 and 11. 11 gave me the answer of 13, and as both are prime numbers, I knew that 1001 was correct.
Molly from Oaklands Primary School, Biggin Hill agrees with the solution. She sent this pdf of her reasoning. Well done Molly!
EWWNP means Exploring Wild and Wonderful Number Patterns Created by Yourself! Investigate what happens if we create number patterns using some simple rules.
This challenge asks you to investigate the total number of cards that would be sent if four children send one to all three others. How many would be sent if there were five children? Six?
If you had any number of ordinary dice, what are the possible ways of making their totals 6? What would the product of the dice be each time?