Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Squares, Squares and More Squares

Age 11 to 14
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions

Sarah sent us her answer to this problem:

Once we've got some number of squares, say n, we can get n+3, by subdividing one of the squares into 4. So if we can get 4, 6 and 8 squares, then we can also get 7, 10, 13, ..., 9, 12, 15, ... and 8, 11, 14, ... squares, that is, we can get 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and in fact everything above this.

Here's how we can get 4, 6, and 8 squares.

Squares

William noticed that you can't make 2, 3 or 5 squares. Here's his explanation for why not:

For 2 or 3 squares, you'd have to have a small square with at least two of its corners at the corners of the big square. But then it would be the same size as the big square, so we'd only use 1 square. For five squares, you'd have to have a different square in each corner (for the reason just explained). But if you think about it you see that if you're going to have more than four squares, then you actually need at least six, so you can't do it with 5.

You may also like

Have You Got It?

Can you explain the strategy for winning this game with any target?

Counting Factors

Is there an efficient way to work out how many factors a large number has?

Is There a Theorem?

Draw a square. A second square of the same size slides around the first always maintaining contact and keeping the same orientation. How far does the dot travel?

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo