Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

The Wrong Stats

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Why do this problem?

This problem forces students to grapple with intuition in statistics and to challenge modelling assumptions. This is important because although statistical modelling is very powerful, knowledge of the areas in which a model is likely to break down is critical to avoid making significant predictive errors. This requires more than a simple algebraic understanding of statistics.

Possible approach

This problem is good for discussion in groups and not ideally suited for individual use, since misconceptions are best uncovered by describing them to other people.

For each part, can anyone suggest compelling reasons why the assumptions cannot be true exactly? Can they suggest how flawed the assumptions are (from 'completely wrong' to 'highly accurate in practice')? Discuss the reasons in groups. The goal is that EVERYONE agrees on the reasoning. It might be that some students doubt the validity of an argument but don't feel confident enough to voice their opinion. Encourage all doubts to be expressed, as this will encourage the clearest thinking of all.

One point to be careful about is that students might try to disclaim an answer via faulty statistical reasoning based on another statistical pre-conception. For example, the first part on the coin toss might be argued away by saying 'If we have had several heads, then the chance of a tail can't remain the same'. Listening carefully to the arguments will help to pick up such errors. Note that this is a very positive aspect of this problem: the more flawed statistical reasoning that the question challenges, the better.

Key questions

Does this part seem plausible to you?
Do you understand exactly the meaning of the technical statistical language?
What 'extreme cases' of the situation might be considered to test the validity of the assumption?

Possible extension

Creating similar statements is a really good way to come to terms with the precise meaning of concepts in statistics. Could students make statement involving the following concepts?

  • Correlation
  • Independence
  • Poisson Distribution
  • Binomial Distribution
  • Continuous vs discrete random variables

Possible support

In a group discussion there is always a useful role for the careful listener. Perhaps those struggling could be used as a critical audience for the explanations of others?

You may also like

History of Morse

This short article gives an outline of the origins of Morse code and its inventor and how the frequency of letters is reflected in the code they were given.

Very Old Man

Is the age of this very old man statistically believable?

Data Matching

Use your skill and judgement to match the sets of random data.

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo