Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Cobalt Decay

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow starYellow starYellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Several students considered this problem with NRICH as a group. Whilst most thought initially to use algebra, they soon realised that there was no unique solution. So, the problem reduced to finding ranges of possible solutions.This was approached with a mixture of algebra and numerical methods.

Steve thought:

Before attempting any calculations I tried to make sense of the numbers, as suggested in the problem.

The first measurement point was $10$ days. Samples of cobalt $60, 57, 56, 58$ would not decay very much in this time.

Since the sample loses about one third of its mass in this time, a large component must be cobalt $58$. However, since there is still about half the sample remaining after $360$ days there must be at most about half of cobalt-58.

I worked out after 10, 90 and 360 days what fraction of a lump of sample of each pure isotope would remain. So , after 10 days about 99.6% of cobalt 60 and 0.63% of cobalt 55 would remain; after 360 days 87.8% of a mass of cobalt-60 would remain but 6.98E-80 of cobalt-55 would remain. Since this felt experimental, I made a spreadsheet where I could work out the total mass remaining for given starting sample


Using common sense (that Co-60 decays very slowly and Co-55 very quickly) I quickly found this solution, which matched the target masses very closely.

There are obviously other solutions, but experimentation indicated that there had to be 30g of Co-55 to match the data.

Tom thought:

Since there are only 4 conditions given (initial mass followed by three observations) and five possible isotope masses the system is under-determined, so there will be no unique solution. Looking at the data, the half lives of Co-56 and Co-58 are similar, so I will make the simplifying assumption that the masses of these two isotopes are equal.

If I choose the initial masses to be $A$, $B$, $C$, $C$, $D$ then my four equations will be

$$
\begin{eqnarray}
A+B+C+C+D &=& 100\cr
A2^{-10/1924.06}+B2^{-10/271.79}+C2^{-10/77.27}+C2^{-10/70.86}+D2^{-10/1.37}&=&68.402\cr
A2^{-90/1924.06}+B2^{-90/271.79}+C2^{-90/77.27}+C2^{-90/70.86}+D2^{-90/1.37}&=&68.402\cr
A2^{-360/1924.06}+B2^{-360/271.79}+C2^{-360/77.27}+C2^{-360/70.86}+D2^{-360/1.37}&=&68.402
\end{eqnarray}
$$
I chose to work with the numbers to 4 decimal places, as this seemed about right given the accuracies in the problem (since the masses remaining were given to 3 dp and the half lives also only to a couple of places)

This gave me equations

$$
\begin{eqnarray}
A&+&B&+&2C&+&D &=& 100\cr
0.9964A&+&0.9748B&+&1.8210C&+&0.0063D&=&68.402\cr
0.9681A&+&0.7949B&+&0.8607C&&&=&58.283\cr
0.8784A&+&0.3993B&+&0.0691C&&&=&48.359
\end{eqnarray}
$$
These looked quite intimidating to solve, but then I just got down to it and it only took a few minutes using a spreadsheet to do the algebra.

I found that $A=41.91, B=15.57,C= 6.18, D=30.14$

I then wondered about the other solutions. I found these solutions:

Isotope Mass Mass Mass Mass
Co-60 52.16 42.31 41.49 41.91
Co-57 0 15.49 15.67 15.58
Co-56 12.90 0 12.68 6.18
Co-58 4.90 12.077 0 6.18
Co-55 30.03 30.121 30.15 30.13


From this table it seems reasonable to assert that

1) There are $30$ grams of Co-55.
2) The combined mass of Co-56 and Co-58 is between 12 and 18 grams.
3) There is at most 16 grams of Co-57
4) There is at least 41 g of Co-60.





You may also like

A Method of Defining Coefficients in the Equations of Chemical Reactions

A simple method of defining the coefficients in the equations of chemical reactions with the help of a system of linear algebraic equations.

Mathematical Issues for Chemists

A brief outline of the mathematical issues faced by chemistry students.

Reaction Rates

Explore the possibilities for reaction rates versus concentrations with this non-linear differential equation

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo