Contributors provided checks that $99^n$ has $2n$ digits and
$999^n$ has $3n$ digits for many values of $n$, and this was enough
for some people to believe that it is always so, but that is
definitely not true.
Soh Yong Sheng, age 12, of Tao Nan School, Singapore argued that
the first digits of the powers of 99 get smaller as the powers
increase so you would expect that eventually there are less than
$2n$ digits.
Although, $99^n$ has $2n$ digits for $n \leq 229$, this is not true
for $n \geq 230$. Similarly $999^n$ has $3n$ digits for $n \leq
2301$ but this is not true $n \geq 2302$.
Sergio Moya and Ling Xiang Ning used the following method. To prove
the result for $99^n$, note that the smallest whole number with
$2n$ digits is $10^{2n-1}$ (for example, the smallest whole number
with 6 digits is a hundred thousand, which is $10^5$). So If $99^n$
has $2n$ digits then we must have $99^n \geq 10^{2n-1}$, and this
means that we must have
so that (1) is false. We can see, then, that $99^{230}$ does NOT
have $2n$ digits. One can check that $99^n$ does have $2n$ digits
for $1 \leq n \leq 229$.
A similar argument shows that $999^n$ does not have $3n$ digits
when $n= 2302$.
Michael Swarbrick-Jones, age 12, Comberton Village College,
Cambridge proved the result using logarithms to the base 10. If you
know about logarithms, you should be able to see that (1) is the
same as
$$\log 10 \geq n \log \left({100\over 99}\right),$$