Contributors provided checks that 99^n has 2n digits and
999^n has 3n digits for many values of n, and this was enough
for some people to believe that it is always so, but that is
definitely not true.
Soh Yong Sheng, age 12, of Tao Nan School, Singapore argued that
the first digits of the powers of 99 get smaller as the powers
increase so you would expect that eventually there are less than
2n digits.
Although, 99^n has 2n digits for n \leq 229, this is not true
for n \geq 230. Similarly 999^n has 3n digits for n \leq
2301 but this is not true n \geq 2302.
Sergio Moya and Ling Xiang Ning used the following method. To prove
the result for 99^n, note that the smallest whole number with
2n digits is 10^{2n-1} (for example, the smallest whole number
with 6 digits is a hundred thousand, which is 10^5). So If 99^n
has 2n digits then we must have 99^n \geq 10^{2n-1}, and this
means that we must have
If we check this on a calculator for n=230 we see that
\left({100\over 99}\right)^{230} = 10.090\cdots
so that (1) is false. We can see, then, that 99^{230} does NOT
have 2n digits. One can check that 99^n does have 2n digits
for 1 \leq n \leq 229.
A similar argument shows that 999^n does not have 3n digits
when n= 2302.
Michael Swarbrick-Jones, age 12, Comberton Village College,
Cambridge proved the result using logarithms to the base 10. If you
know about logarithms, you should be able to see that (1) is the
same as
\log 10 \geq n \log \left({100\over 99}\right),
which gives
n \leq {\log 10\over \log (100/99)} = 229.1\cdots .
A similar argument shows that if 999^n has 3n digits, then
n \leq {\log 10\over \log (1000/999)} = 2301.4\cdots .
Can you show that 9^n has n digits when n\leq 21 but not
otherwise? You may be able to do this directly on your calculator.
Can you show that 87^n has 2n digits when n \leq 16 but not
otherwise?