Or search by topic
In 1908 the Olympic Games were held in London, that's just over 100 years ago. Then, just after World War 2 they were again in London in 1948
Here are the results from some track events;
100 metres 10.8 secs
200 metres 22.6 secs
400 metres 50.0 secs
800 metres 112 secs
1500 metres 240 secs
100 metres 10.3 secs
200 metres 21.1 secs
400 metres 46.2 secs
800 metres 109 secs
1500 metres 229 secs
The 2012 London Olympics were another 64 years later.
How did the results differ?
Could you have predicted the results?
Perhaps more importantly, what's the reason for your answer?
Looking at the 2012 Olympic Medal table, can you see how the data is organised? Could the results be presented differently to give another nation the top place?
Look at some of the results from the Olympic Games in the past. How do you compare if you try some similar activities?