Or search by topic
In $1908$ the Olympic Games were held in London, that's just over $100$ years ago. Then, just after World War $2$ they were again in London in $1948$
Here are the results from some track events;
$100$ metres $10.8$ secs
$200$ metres $22.6$ secs
$400$ metres $50.0$ secs
$800$ metres $112$ secs
$1500$ metres $240$ secs
$100$ metres $10.3$ secs
$200$ metres $21.1$ secs
$400$ metres $46.2$ secs
$800$ metres $109$ secs
$1500$ metres $229$ secs
The 2012 London Olympics were another 64 years later.
How did the results differ?
Could you have predicted the results?
Perhaps more importantly, what's the reason for your answer?
Looking at the 2012 Olympic Medal table, can you see how the data is organised? Could the results be presented differently to give another nation the top place?
Look at some of the results from the Olympic Games in the past. How do you compare if you try some similar activities?