Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Equation Attack

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Well done Rhema from Crown Woods School, Simon from Elizabeth College, Guernsey,Trevor from Queen Elizabeth's School, Barnet and Andrei from Tudor Vianu National College, Bucharest, Romania, you all sent in good solutions. To find the solution as a numerical approximation, Andrei used interval halving and a graphical method, Trevor and Simon used the Newton-Raphson method, Trevor used a spreadsheet for the calculations and Simon wrote a program in C to do the calculations.

Case (i)

If $a = b$ the equation $a^x + b^x = 1$ where $0< a, b < 1$ and $a + b < 1$ becomes $2a^x =1 $. Then $\log 2 + x \log a = 0$ so the solution can be given in three equivalent forms: $$x = {-\log 2 \over \log a} = {\log 0.5 \over \log a } = {\log 2 \over \log 1/a}.$$ Note we can use natural logarithms here or logarithms to any base.

Case (ii)

Solve $a^x + b^x = 1$, where $a=1/2$ and $b=1/4$. The equation is: $$(1/2)^x + (1/4)^x = 1,$$ Here you could substitute $y = (1/2)^x$ but Trevor multiplied by $4^x$ and used the substitution $y = 2^x$. By Trevor's method: $$4^x/2^x + 1 = 4^x$$ So $$2^x + 1 = (2^x)^2.$$ and the equation becomes: $y + 1= y^2$ or $y^2- y- 1 = 0$. Using the quadratic formula, the negative solution to the quadratic can be ignored as $2^x$ is never negative, so the solution is: $$y={1+ \sqrt 5 \over 2}$$ (note this equals the golden ratio, $\phi $). Therefore $2^x = \phi$ and so $x\ln 2 = \ln \phi$ and the solution is: $$x= {\ln \phi \over \ln 2} ={ \ln (1 + \sqrt 5)/2 \over \ln 2}$$ giving $x = 0.69424$ to 5 significant figures

Case (iii)

This is Andrei's method using interval halving:

Here I observe that I cannot solve the equation directly. First I shall prove that for any $0 < a, b < 1$, with $a + b < 1$, the equation $a^x + b^x = 1$ has a unique solution. Let $f: [0,1] \to R, f(x) = a^x + b^x - 1$ then $$f(0) = 1 > 0, f(1) = a + b - 1 < 0$$ and $f$ is a continuous function, so $f(x) = 0$ has at least one solution in its interval of definition. I shall now prove it is unique. The derivative $$f'(x) = a^x \ln a + b^x \ln b < 0,$$ as $a$ and $b < 1$. So, $f$ is strictly decreasing and the solution is unique.

For the case of the problem, $a =1/2$ and $b = 1/3$ I cannot find the exact value of the root, but I can find a good approximation of the solution. I shall use the interval halving method. Let $x_0$ be the root. The first value that I choose is 1/2.
\begin{eqnarray} f(1/2) = 0.28 > 0 \Rightarrow 1/2 < x_0 < 1 & : & f(3/4) = 0.03 > 0\Rightarrow 3/4 < x_0 < 1 \\ f(7/8) = -0.07 < 0 \Rightarrow 3/4 < x_0 < 7/8 & : & f(13/16) = -0.02 < 0 \Rightarrow 3/4 < x_0 < 13/16 \\ f(25/32) = 0.005 > 0 \Rightarrow 25/32 < x_0 < 13/16 & : & f(51/64) = - 0.007 < 0 \Rightarrow 25/32 < x_0 < 51/64\\ f(101/128) = -0.001 < 0 \Rightarrow 25/32 < x_0 < 101/128 & : & f(201/256) = 0.002 > 0 \Rightarrow 201/256 < x_0 < 101/128 \\ f(403/512) = 0.0006 > 0 \Rightarrow 403/512 < x_0 < 101/128 & : & f(707/1024) = -0.0001 < 0 \Rightarrow 403/512 < x_0 < 807/1024.\\ \end{eqnarray}
So, $0.7871 < x_0 < 0.7880$. Continuing the procedure, I could find a better approximation for the root $x_0$.
graph Another method, though less precise, would have been a graphical one. In this graph I have plotted f(x) and the solution is given by the intersection with the x-axis.

Simon used the Newton-Raphson method and a computer to work out the answers to this part

Differentiating the function $f(x) = a^x + b^x - 1$ gives $f'(x)=\ln a . a^x + \ln b . b^x.$ Using the Newton-Raphson formula: $$x_{r+1} = x_r - {f(x_r)\over f'(x_r)}$$ gives $$x_{r+1} = x_r - {a^{x_r} + b^{x_r} - 1 \over \ln a . a^{x_r} + \ln b . b^{x_r}}.$$ As the notes allow us to use a programmable calculator, which I interpreted to mean computer, as that is essentially what a computer is, I coded a script in C to do this problem for me.

The approximate value for x: 0.784453067133075 (using $a=1/2, \ b=1/3$.)

C script

Here is Trevor's spreadsheet for this calculation.

You may also like

Big, Bigger, Biggest

Which is the biggest and which the smallest of $2000^{2002}, 2001^{2001} \text{and } 2002^{2000}$?

Infinite Continued Fractions

In this article we are going to look at infinite continued fractions - continued fractions that do not terminate.

Gosh Cosh

Explore the hyperbolic functions sinh and cosh using what you know about the exponential function.

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo