Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Impossible Square?

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow starYellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

Why do this problem

This question is a nice introduction to the concept of proof by contradiction: something concrete (the area of a square) is calculated in two different ways, and these ways are shown to be inconsistent.

Possible approach

This problem could be offered with no advice. Students may experiment with the ideas of visual proofs before realising that they will need to look at an algebraic solution.

Once the algebra has led to the solution, it is a useful exercise to ask students to explain in words why the absurdity leads to the rejection of the square shape, rather than the rejection of one of the methods of calculation or the rejection of some of their assumptions concerning the base triangles or the concept of area.

If the students believe that the square shape is impossible, they could be pressed on why they are so sure of their methods of calculation. Such discussion may lead to an increased appreciation of the need for axioms in mathematics which are statements that are agreed by all to be true and from which all else follows.


Key Questions

What formulas for area will we need to use in this question?
How can we relate these two formulas?

[once someone claims to have solved the problem] Can you explain to the class why we cannot make a square?

Possible extensions

For the interested student, the article Proof by Contradiction offers interesting and stimulating reading on the concept of proof by contradiction.

Alternatively, students could try to experiment to find other shapes which cannot be made from the triangles. For example,
  • Which rectangles is it possible to make using these triangles?
  • How many orientations of triangle are possible in a general completed jigsaw?

Possible support

To get started, why not try the simpler related problem The Square Hole

Related Collections

  • Other videos

You may also like

Circles Ad Infinitum

A circle is inscribed in an equilateral triangle. Smaller circles touch it and the sides of the triangle, the process continuing indefinitely. What is the sum of the areas of all the circles?

Areas and Ratios

Do you have enough information to work out the area of the shaded quadrilateral?

Climbing Powers

$2\wedge 3\wedge 4$ could be $(2^3)^4$ or $2^{(3^4)}$. Does it make any difference? For both definitions, which is bigger: $r\wedge r\wedge r\wedge r\dots$ where the powers of $r$ go on for ever, or $(r^r)^r$, where $r$ is $\sqrt{2}$?

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo