Skip over navigation
Cambridge University Faculty of Mathematics NRich logo
menu search
  • Teachers expand_more
    • Early years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
    • Events
    • Professional development
  • Students expand_more
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Parents expand_more
    • Early Years
    • Primary
    • Secondary
    • Post-16
  • Problem-Solving Schools
  • About NRICH expand_more
    • About us
    • Impact stories
    • Support us
    • Our funders
    • Contact us
  • search

Or search by topic

Number and algebra

  • The Number System and Place Value
  • Calculations and Numerical Methods
  • Fractions, Decimals, Percentages, Ratio and Proportion
  • Properties of Numbers
  • Patterns, Sequences and Structure
  • Algebraic expressions, equations and formulae
  • Coordinates, Functions and Graphs

Geometry and measure

  • Angles, Polygons, and Geometrical Proof
  • 3D Geometry, Shape and Space
  • Measuring and calculating with units
  • Transformations and constructions
  • Pythagoras and Trigonometry
  • Vectors and Matrices

Probability and statistics

  • Handling, Processing and Representing Data
  • Probability

Working mathematically

  • Thinking mathematically
  • Developing positive attitudes
  • Cross-curricular contexts

Advanced mathematics

  • Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Advanced Probability and Statistics
  • Mechanics
  • Calculus

For younger learners

  • Early Years Foundation Stage

Impossible Square?

Age 16 to 18
Challenge Level Yellow starYellow star
  • Problem
  • Getting Started
  • Student Solutions
  • Teachers' Resources

We received three good solutions to this problem. First of all, Josh from Lyng Hall wrote in
The area of the square you make can either be worked out by:
  • base x height

or,
  • area of triangle x number of triangles

Dealing with the triangles first, they are right angled with 30 and 60 degrees in the other two corners and unit lenghth hypotenuse. This means, by trigonometry, the other two sides will be $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$. From this we can deduce the area of the triangle will be: $$\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{8}$$ The square must be a multiple of this so its area is: $$n\frac{\sqrt{3}}{8}$$ The edges of the square must be made up of a combination of sides of the triangle so can be written as follows:
  • Base: $a\times \frac{1}{2} + b\times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + c\times 1$
  • Height: $d\times \frac{1}{2} + e\times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\times \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + f\times 1$
So its area is: $$\left(\frac{a}{2} + b\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + c\right)\times\left(\frac{d}{2} + e\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + f\right) = \frac{ad}{4} + ae\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}+ a\frac{f}{2} + bd\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} + be\frac{3}{4} + bf\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + c\frac{d}{2} + ce\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + cf$$ If these two areas are equal then the parts without $\sqrt{3}$ must cancel out. All of a, b, c, d, e and f cannot be negative as they are the number of edges so ad, af, be, cd, cf must be zero. If we take a to be zero then the first two are zero, if c is zero then the last two are zero, this leaves be. If b is zero then the base has no length so it must be e that is zero. If you apply this to the expansion then you are left with: $bd\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}+ bf\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$ which could equal $n\frac{\sqrt{3}}{8}$. But a square also has to have both side lengths equal this means (with a,c and e zero) that: $$b\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} =\frac{d}{2} + f$$ This cannot be true as the right hand side cannot become a multiple of root3. This can be done with any selection being zero, but there is only one other possible combination. This is b, f and d = zero. You end up with; $$a/2 + c = e\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$ which is again impossible.


Steven from City of Sunderland College sent in a similar excellent solution. You can read his write-up in this attached word document.

Robert also gave a solution, and realised that a very advanced (university-level) proof would require us to justify the following results, for which he gave three good proofs. This section would make good reading for any students considering taking a mathematics degree.

In order to solve this problem I will first state and prove some theorems concerning irrational numbers.

Theorem: $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational :

Proof: Assume $\sqrt{3} = a/b$ where $a$ and $b$ are integers and $a/b$ is a fraction in its simplest terms. Then $$ 3 = a^2/b^2 \Rightarrow 3b^2 = a^2 \Rightarrow 3|a^2 \Rightarrow 3|a \Rightarrow 9|a^2 $$ So let $a^2 = 9m$ for some integer m. $\Rightarrow 3b^2 = 9m \Rightarrow b^2 = 3m \Rightarrow 3|b^2 \Rightarrow 3|b$ Therefore if 3 divides both a and b, the fraction $a/b$ is not in its simplest form, which is a contradiction. Thus $\sqrt{3}$ does not equal $a/b$ (for any integers a or b) and so $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

Now I shall state and prove some theorems:

Theorem: An irrational number multiplied by a rational number is irrational.

Proof: Let m be an irrational number and let n be a rational number. Thus $n = a/b$, for integers $a$ and $b$. So let us assume that $mn$ is rational thus: $mn = c/d$ for some integers $c$ and $d$. Therefore, $$ (am)/b = c/d \Rightarrow am = (bc)/d \Rightarrow m = (bc)/(ad) $$ Because $bc$ and $ad$ will both be integers, say $e$ and $f$ respectively, then $(bc)/(ad) = e/f$, which is rational, however $e/f$ also equals $m$ which is known to be irrational, which is a contradiction. Therefore an irrational multiplied by a rational must be irrational.

Theorem: A rational number divided by an irrational number is irrational.

Proof: Let m be irrational and n be rational and let us assume that $n/m = a/b$ where $a$ and $b$ are both integers. Now because $n$ is rational we can denote it by $c/d$ where $c$ and $d$ are both integers. Therefore, $$ c/(dm) = a/b \Rightarrow m = bc/ad $$ and because $ad$ and $bc$ will both be integers say $e$ and $f$ respectively, then: $m = f/e$, which is a contradiction because m is irrational and f/e is rational thus $n/m$ must be irrational.

Theorem: A rational number plus an irrational number is irrational.

Proof: Let m be irrational and n be rational, hence $n$ can be expressed as $a/b$ for integers $a$ and $b$. Let us assume that $m$ plus $n$ is rational thus, $m + n = c/d$, for integers $c$ and $d$ $\Rightarrow m + a/b = c/d \Rightarrow m = (bc - ad)/(bd)$, which will be rational, but we have said that $m$ is irrational so this a contradiction and thus $(m + n)$ must be irrational.








Related Collections

  • Other videos

You may also like

Circles Ad Infinitum

A circle is inscribed in an equilateral triangle. Smaller circles touch it and the sides of the triangle, the process continuing indefinitely. What is the sum of the areas of all the circles?

Areas and Ratios

Do you have enough information to work out the area of the shaded quadrilateral?

Climbing Powers

$2\wedge 3\wedge 4$ could be $(2^3)^4$ or $2^{(3^4)}$. Does it make any difference? For both definitions, which is bigger: $r\wedge r\wedge r\wedge r\dots$ where the powers of $r$ go on for ever, or $(r^r)^r$, where $r$ is $\sqrt{2}$?

  • Tech help
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter X logo

The NRICH Project aims to enrich the mathematical experiences of all learners. To support this aim, members of the NRICH team work in a wide range of capacities, including providing professional development for teachers wishing to embed rich mathematical tasks into everyday classroom practice.

NRICH is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.

University of Cambridge logo NRICH logo